i did not know lightroom automatically makes galleries from rejected files.

what do you mean?

--
love thy unicorn

that the criteria of selection didn't seem to be technical perfection, due to the many out-of-focus/color/exposure images featured on the website.

i think you could edit more strictly (i.e. kick rajahsthan out) and remove the really short galleries (i.e. portraits) until you have enough material (maybe 10-15 good photos) to make a proper gallery.

and i really like the website design, font like times goes really well with the simple layout. might do good to be able to navigate back to the last image though. apart of that well made, no clicks lost on the way to the gallery and no unnecessarily distracting graphics.

you´re right about the selection, but im oki with for now.

--
love thy unicorn

i actually think the selection is above the average, and way above the tons of pseudo-slick "pro" portfolios out there.... quite beyond the obvious.

what computer/monitor are you using for editing?

i did not know you were such a fan of disneyland.

go do a handstand and have some of your sparkling wine!

now we're getting a bit too far with the progressiveness, don't zou think+

haha. thx

--
love thy unicorn