that the criteria of selection didn't seem to be technical perfection, due to the many out-of-focus/color/exposure images featured on the website.
i think you could edit more strictly (i.e. kick rajahsthan out) and remove the really short galleries (i.e. portraits) until you have enough material (maybe 10-15 good photos) to make a proper gallery.
and i really like the website design, font like times goes really well with the simple layout. might do good to be able to navigate back to the last image though. apart of that well made, no clicks lost on the way to the gallery and no unnecessarily distracting graphics.
Devious Comments
--
love thy unicorn
i think you could edit more strictly (i.e. kick rajahsthan out) and remove the really short galleries (i.e. portraits) until you have enough material (maybe 10-15 good photos) to make a proper gallery.
and i really like the website design, font like times goes really well with the simple layout. might do good to be able to navigate back to the last image though. apart of that well made, no clicks lost on the way to the gallery and no unnecessarily distracting graphics.
--
love thy unicorn
what computer/monitor are you using for editing?
--
love thy unicorn
Previous Page12Next Page